Town Square

Post a New Topic

Why are key California affordable housing bills bottled up?

Original post made on Jul 29, 2021

Affordable housing advocates are asking why bills supported by Senate leader Toni Atkins are stuck in the Assembly. One answer appears to be a provision pushed by the State Building and Construction Trades Council.

Read the full story here Web Link posted Thursday, July 29, 2021, 1:36 PM

Comments (5)

Posted by Raymond
a resident of Monta Loma
on Jul 29, 2021 at 2:31 pm

Raymond is a registered user.

Since my arrival in California, the population has doubled twice. There is no limit to the number of people who would like to live here. Open borders and policies to pay illegal and legal immigrants to come here provide unnecessary incentives. The Democratic Party is just in a hurry to enhance vote fraud.
Many of the people who presently live in California recognize that environmental values and quality of life decline as population density increases. That may be providing some friction against legislature bills that would remove local control from zoning to increase housing density where we live.


Posted by Randy Guelph
a resident of Cuernavaca
on Jul 29, 2021 at 7:52 pm

Randy Guelph is a registered user.

Raymond, you came here 70 years ago? The rest of your post make so much more sense in that context.


Posted by ivg
a resident of Another Mountain View Neighborhood
on Jul 30, 2021 at 9:44 am

ivg is a registered user.

Yeah, let's make sure only millionaires can afford to live here, then we won't have any voter fraud. Or much of anything else, for that matter.


Posted by LongResident
a resident of another community
on Jul 30, 2021 at 6:34 pm

LongResident is a registered user.

The bills are not about affordable housing for the most part. They deserve to be held up for that reason alone. They are about being pork barrel rewards to the construction industry and developers. So you can see why the labor unions want a taste too. Separate out what is really an affordable housing bill and most of these bills fall by the wayside. That's okay with me. We don't need to pander to profiteers who want to make money off of an alleged housing shortage when you consider how much market rate housing is being built with no law changes at all.

Say we realize that current strawman targets envision way less than half, maybe just 25% of new construction be affordable housing. Then you can tell the labor unions to simply rely on everything else. No need to weigh down affordable units with labor requirements of any sort. That would be a good change to state law.

I do think it's very telling that the package of bills would be characterized as being about affordable housing. All the new construction yields housing which is inherently more expensive than what already exists. It's NEW, so it is priced higher.


Posted by Randy Guelph
a resident of Cuernavaca
on Jul 30, 2021 at 9:24 pm

Randy Guelph is a registered user.

I'll point out for the curious: doubling twice over 70 years is a whopping....2% growth per year.


Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.

Email:


Post a comment

On Wednesday, we'll be launching a new website. To prepare and make sure all our content is available on the new platform, commenting on stories and in TownSquare has been disabled. When the new site is online, past comments will be available to be seen and we'll reinstate the ability to comment. We appreciate your patience while we make this transition..

Stay informed.

Get the day's top headlines from Mountain View Online sent to your inbox in the Express newsletter.