Read the full story here Web Link posted Thursday, April 30, 2020, 12:57 PM
Town Square
Judge rules Los Altos violated state housing laws in blocking downtown project
Original post made on Apr 30, 2020
Read the full story here Web Link posted Thursday, April 30, 2020, 12:57 PM
Comments (6)
a resident of Old Mountain View
on Apr 30, 2020 at 2:14 pm
[Post removed due to trolling]
a resident of Castro City
on Apr 30, 2020 at 3:43 pm
This should be a wake up call to the City Council of Mountain View.
They better stop trying to avoid complying with the new housing laws like SB 330 or they will wind up in the same place.
This was a very foreseeable judgment.
a resident of The Crossings
on Apr 30, 2020 at 5:02 pm
So people in a town are no longer entitled to determine the type of community they want to live in. Good to know.
A government organization and a judge, neither of which reside in the community, get to decide what that community must look like. They get to force the residents to tolerate an ugly high-rise building, despite the fact that the residents don't WANT the ugly high-rise building.
Keep that in mind the next time you vote for these people. They know how to run your town better than you do. They must be brilliant.
a resident of The Crossings
on Apr 30, 2020 at 5:19 pm
On what planet is a five-story building a "high-rise"? People might take you more seriously and be sympathetic to your cause if you didn't act like Chicken Little.
a resident of Old Mountain View
on May 1, 2020 at 9:58 am
Funny to watch the ebb and flow of sentiments between local, decentralized and federal, centralized governance. Public policy is complicated, cities are not sovereigns, there are overlapping authorities in re: such matters
a resident of Castro City
on May 1, 2020 at 1:24 pm
In response to psr you wrote:
“So people in a town are no longer entitled to determine the type of community they want to live in. Good to know.”
That philosophy inevitably results in housing discrimination via disparate impact, there are almost hundreds of cases to report in the judicial record to prove it. What you are trying to do is use a cloaking device on housing discrimination. Under the idea of the power of community determination of who is preferred to be a member of the community. WOW You said:
“A government organization and a judge, neither of which reside in the community, get to decide what that community must look like. They get to force the residents to tolerate an ugly high-rise building, despite the fact that the residents don't WANT the ugly high-rise building.”
You are first making a assertion that hasn’t even happened yet. You are trying to use FEAR to mask the people’s attention to distract from the real problem which is a lack of housing. That lack of housing has been used to artificially inflate housing values in the state of California as far back as 1970. Show us any high rise in the city of Mountain View that is the results of your claim? You said:
“Keep that in mind the next time you vote for these people. They know how to run your town better than you do. They must be brilliant.”
I cannot argue with this, but the current City Council has NO expertise in urban development, or civil engineering. You are correct that we do not vote the right people into offices, where they do not have the qualifications to perform this task.
Don't miss out
on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.
Post a comment
Stay informed.
Get the day's top headlines from Mountain View Online sent to your inbox in the Express newsletter.