Measure T($259 million in borrowing) "will fund" whatever the school district later chooses - including drinks and higher salaries all around. Cheers!

Sorry Pat - "whatever" does not match ANY of the facts surrounding Bond revenue limitations.

However - MVWSD Board President Wilson - you also appear to be unaware of the law! There is absolutely NO "will" check in the text of the Measure you voted to put up. There is no legally enforceable "Will" or "school" (or Oversight Committee direction) in the legal text of the measure. It is ALL at the complete discretion of a FUTURE Board majority how "the specifics" from the laundry list of projects will be actually chosen. The legal word President Wilson, (and citizens) is "may."

So your wonderfull list of bulletpoints, is a "may". The Foothill DeAnza Bond, Measure G, also is "may" not "shall" for any fraction that might have been legally prioritized.

"will" or "shall" -
I'm such a poor speller that I should discontinue 'auto spell replace'

Measure G. I agree with Ms. Shartwell / I voted for small parcel tax for community college district. Small in dollars and small in extent (5 years). Goes directly to General Fund for instruction, staff, student programs etc. IMO community colleges need more support than they have been recieving from the state over the last two decades.

(I also voted Yes on State Proposition 13, non-local-revenue facilities bond, paid state-wide)

Well it does look like the city voted it down by almost a 2 to 1 vote ratio

Wow