Town Square

Post a New Topic

Vaping ordinance and youth mental health are now top goals for Mountain View City Council

Original post made on Feb 7, 2020

Faced with too many ambitious plans and not nearly enough staff time, the Mountain View City Council took a scalpel to its long list of big-ticket priorities Tuesday night.

Read the full story here Web Link posted Friday, February 7, 2020, 9:57 AM

Comments (2)

Posted by USA
a resident of Old Mountain View
on Feb 7, 2020 at 1:33 pm

How about working on the basics of running the city such as street repairs, park maintenance, police patrols, etc?


Posted by PeaceLove
a resident of Shoreline West
on Feb 8, 2020 at 6:21 pm

>Also getting added to the priority list is an ordinance restricting the sale of electronic cigarettes and vaping products >within city limits, which could come back to the council for a vote in June.

Authoritarian much?

Considering:
1. Cigarettes are still legal and sold literally everywhere, including throughout Mountain View
2. Cigarettes are responsible for around 400,000 American deaths each year
Therefore: Banning electronic cigarettes and other vaping products -- but not cigarettes themselves -- is illogical and self-evidently stupid if your goal is to prevent needless deaths above all other priorities.

Considering:
1. Adults in the U.S. are generally free to use tobacco in Mountain View and elsewhere
2 Cigarettes cause enormous suffering and death *even when used as directed*
Therefore: The City Council is acting in an authoritarian manner by moving to ban one particular, and much less dangerous -- delivery system for nicotine such that adults will have to travel out of the city to stock up.

Besides being authoritarian, this law would disproportionately target low-income adults and others who may lack a convenient way to drive to the next town over to get their vaping fix.

>A study last February found a reduction in tobacco use among youth and young adults in areas that adopted robust >compliance checks and enforcement programs to monitor illicit sales to minors.

Hilarious. This sentence literally undermines the previous one by citing a study about "robust compliance checks and enforcement programs," NOT a sales ban. Is this just very sloppy editing or is the Voice's bias showing?


Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.

Email:


Post a comment

On Wednesday, we'll be launching a new website. To prepare and make sure all our content is available on the new platform, commenting on stories and in TownSquare has been disabled. When the new site is online, past comments will be available to be seen and we'll reinstate the ability to comment. We appreciate your patience while we make this transition..

Stay informed.

Get the day's top headlines from Mountain View Online sent to your inbox in the Express newsletter.