Town Square

Post a New Topic

Councilman's conflict hangs over new LASD school

Original post made on Sep 14, 2018

A string of City Council decisions to facilitate a $100 million deal for a new public school site could be thrown into limbo over an alleged conflict from one councilman's side business. Mountain View city officials are seriously evaluating an alleged conflict of interest stemming from Councilman John McAlister's partial ownership of a private preschool located on a Los Altos School District campus.

Read the full story here Web Link posted Friday, September 14, 2018, 12:00 AM

Comments (6)

Posted by Francis
a resident of Sylvan Park
on Sep 14, 2018 at 4:13 am

Francis is a registered user.

Why would anyone honestly support such a bad deal for Mountain View?


Posted by Curious
a resident of another community
on Sep 14, 2018 at 12:44 pm

When will the FPPC reach their decision? Before Oct. 16?


Posted by Conflict or Bribe
a resident of another community
on Sep 14, 2018 at 1:45 pm

McAlister says this is a non issue motivated by the charter school. Why does this matter? Does he think the site somehow will be bad for the charter school? Is he intending that the vote should hurt the charter school? If it's such a good site for a school, why would the charter school mind using it? Does not putting any sort of a cap on how many kids LASD can dump on the one site have any effect on the charter schools reception of the idea? Would they object to using it if it were a regular LASD school site with average 480 kids?

Now as to conflict of interest, the city attorney is thinking too narrowly. What's the market value of the site that the preschool is renting? The city of Los Altos is discussing $260,000 per year for a similar site. Stepping Stones pays $25K per year. If you're getting a subsidy like this from LASD, narrow definitions aside, doesn't it create a perception of a vote having been bought and prepaid for? When does a conflict move over to being a bribe used to buy political favors?


Posted by Quid Pro Quo
a resident of another community
on Sep 14, 2018 at 2:15 pm

Some things to note about the various leases made by LASD. The Stepping Stones lease is the only lease not made to a non-profit. Stepping Stones is a for-profit business. The tenant which the city of Los Altos wants to charge $260,000 is also a non profit which has leases from LASD as well. If Stepping Stones were a non-profit, then this quid pro quo would not be so strong. But McAlister gets a share of the profits of Stepping Stones, so he directly benefits from any cost savings in rent by the preschool.

It's pretty bad.


Posted by Mrs. Main Street
a resident of Old Mountain View
on Sep 16, 2018 at 8:14 am

Hmm, numbers do not lie. The broader Los altos and MV community need the facts. Stepping stones is a Private pre school on Public land. The city of Los Altos is discussing $260,000 per year for a similar site. Stepping Stones pays $25K per year. If you're getting a subsidy like this from LASD, narrow definitions aside, doesn't it create a perception of a vote having been bought and prepaid for? When does a conflict move over to being a bribe used to buy political favors?


Posted by Residents First?
a resident of Another Mountain View Neighborhood
on Sep 16, 2018 at 9:37 am

Mountain View Councilman McAlister used to run his campaign on the slogan "Residents First." Too bad he has seemly decided to have switched to My Pocketbook First. Or is that now Los Altos School Board & Superintendent First? Too bad.


Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.

Email:


Post a comment

On Wednesday, we'll be launching a new website. To prepare and make sure all our content is available on the new platform, commenting on stories and in TownSquare has been disabled. When the new site is online, past comments will be available to be seen and we'll reinstate the ability to comment. We appreciate your patience while we make this transition..

Stay informed.

Get the day's top headlines from Mountain View Online sent to your inbox in the Express newsletter.