Town Square

Post a New Topic

Justices reject Brock Turner's appeal

Original post made on Aug 9, 2018

An appellate court affirmed on Wednesday the conviction of former Stanford University student Brock Turner, who was controversially sentenced to six months in jail after being found guilty of sexually penetrating an unconscious and intoxicated woman after an on-campus fraternity party in 2015.

Read the full story here Web Link posted Thursday, August 9, 2018, 11:24 AM

Comments (3)

Posted by Maher
a resident of Martens-Carmelita
on Aug 9, 2018 at 5:14 pm

??? "outercourse" ??? what nonsense will the boys clubbers design to "man splain"/ disguise sexual asssault i.e. rape with an unconscious woman or any woman? These specious distinctions/rationales have had their day... run their course. Now decent men and outraged women are refusing to tolerate them anymore. Turner should be sent to prison for life...these guys don't change... they just get better at that crime. I'm betting the young woman in this case was just the last in a string of such "daddy approved" boys will be boys crimes against women.

So glad the appellate court did its job. I wish they had ruled a mistrial and forced this predator to be dealt with by a more responsible judge who'd listen to the jury's recommendation for a prison term.

#Enough!


Posted by Appellate Ruling
a resident of another community
on Aug 9, 2018 at 8:46 pm

The ruling actually something to the effect that the fact that he was engaging in a different sex act (which they named as "dry humping") was not any indication that he didn't also have other things in mind.

So it seems to me they are saying the jury could read his mind. It seems to me that some of these actions have a given sequence. Sure he could have something else in mind, but how soon, and would he really keep at it that long. They also said he could tell she was too far gone to consent. But at what point would this have become the case? Are they both saying he should refrain from continuing and at the same time just assuming that he would not so refrain?

It's all a bit complicated.


Posted by Whataboutism?
a resident of Another Mountain View Neighborhood
on Aug 9, 2018 at 10:13 pm

Appellate Ruling -- "They also said he could tell she was too far gone to consent. But at what point would this have become the case? Are they both saying he should refrain from continuing and at the same time just assuming that he would not so refrain?"

Why don't you just come out and say that you're supporting Brock Turner, and stop with all of this whataboutism?

He engaged in an act of sexual assault. Period.


Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.

Email:


Post a comment

On Wednesday, we'll be launching a new website. To prepare and make sure all our content is available on the new platform, commenting on stories and in TownSquare has been disabled. When the new site is online, past comments will be available to be seen and we'll reinstate the ability to comment. We appreciate your patience while we make this transition..

Stay informed.

Get the day's top headlines from Mountain View Online sent to your inbox in the Express newsletter.