Town Square

Post a New Topic

$647M to electrify Caltrain tracks approved

Original post made on May 22, 2017

Caltrain's electrification project can move forward as the Federal Transit Administration plans to sign a $647 million grant agreement to fund the long-awaited work, the agency said Monday.

Read the full story here Web Link posted Monday, May 22, 2017, 1:01 PM

Comments (12)

Posted by tommygee54
a resident of Rex Manor
on May 22, 2017 at 2:50 pm

I am just so thrilled about this decision. Now I can rest assured (hopefully) that there is an at grade crossing buile at Rengstorff at Central Expressway within the next 5 years. I have hated this intersection for the past 47 years!!!


Posted by Mike
a resident of Gemello
on May 22, 2017 at 3:01 pm

Thank gosh the inner beltway crowd came to their senses. Lets get this project moving!


Posted by Diablo
a resident of Monta Loma
on May 22, 2017 at 3:35 pm

+100 on the Rengstorff below grade crossing. That will be a massive improvement. What we have now is the definition of gridlock!

Also looking forward to quieter and cleaner trains, as I'm about 1/2 block from the tracks. The capacity increase is a very big deal as well.

Three cheers for Anna Eshoo and everyone else involved in the lobbying effort.


Posted by Allen
a resident of Shoreline West
on May 22, 2017 at 3:38 pm

Want will happen with Castro Street at Central?


Posted by Electrified
a resident of Cuesta Park
on May 22, 2017 at 3:39 pm

This is fantastic news, both because it's a worthwhile project, and because how all of the Trump supporters were gloating about how the new administration was going to withhold funding to hurt California. Gosh, I'm so tired of all this winning.


Posted by corrupt
a resident of Willowgate
on May 22, 2017 at 7:39 pm

I hope that the Carolyn Flowers corruption scandal does not fall though the cracks. To recap, after approving funding from the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) for Caltrain's “modernization program”, the LA Times published an article revealing that former FTA Administrator Carolyn Flowers, has suddenly been employed by AECOM, a major vendor to Caltrain. AECOM has a financial interest in the “modernization” project, which the grant will fund.

It reeks of corruption when a federal official approves a grant then takes a job with one of the beneficiaries of said grant. At the very least, Flowers should be dismissed and AECOM should be disqualified from working on the project.


Posted by Oh Well
a resident of Cuernavaca
on May 23, 2017 at 4:15 pm

[Portion removed due to disrespectful comment or offensive language]
Without greatly expanded station parking, there will be many empty seats on the expanded schedule.


Posted by Bad
a resident of Another Mountain View Neighborhood
on May 24, 2017 at 11:03 am

Electrification will bring a lot more trains speeding through MV. Think the noise is bad now? Just wait!


Posted by Mike Laursen
a resident of Monta Loma
on May 24, 2017 at 12:59 pm

Are the at-grade crossings part of this? I'm just wondering because it's not mentioned explicitly in the article. Well, and I'm also wondering because the Central-Rengstorff crossing is in one corner of our Monta Loma neighborhood.


Posted by Alfred Newman
a resident of North Whisman
on May 25, 2017 at 2:51 pm

The Voice deleted someone's comment about how the federal decision to fund takes some of the wind out of local criticism of the current DC administration. There was nothing offensive about it, but I guess the Voice is Deep Blue Democrat, intolerant of any criticism of CA. Let's see how long this comment lasts.


Posted by Rail Rider
a resident of Old Mountain View
on May 26, 2017 at 9:08 am

"Without greatly expanded station parking, there will be many empty seats on the expanded schedule."

Lol you've clearly never ridden Caltrain. Every rush hour train is already over capacity. Average is about 130% capacity for the bullet trains. We are lucky to be in MV because we can usually get a seat ahead of the PA riders.

The station is also full of Uber/Lyft drivers picking up and dropping off passengers. Why pay for inconvenient parking?

Sure, we could use more parking, it would serve downtown nicely. But does not need to be our highest priority.


Posted by Name hidden
a resident of Whisman Station

on Sep 26, 2017 at 6:19 am

Due to repeated violations of our Terms of Use, comments from this poster are automatically removed. Why?


Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.

Email:


Post a comment

On Wednesday, we'll be launching a new website. To prepare and make sure all our content is available on the new platform, commenting on stories and in TownSquare has been disabled. When the new site is online, past comments will be available to be seen and we'll reinstate the ability to comment. We appreciate your patience while we make this transition..

Stay informed.

Get the day's top headlines from Mountain View Online sent to your inbox in the Express newsletter.