Town Square

Post a New Topic

Tentative agreement reached on teacher salaries

Original post made on Jun 16, 2016

The Mountain View Whisman School District has announced that it has reached a tentative agreement with its teachers' union, following stalls and tough negotiations on teacher pay that threatened to extend bargaining meetings into the fall. The agreement would bump teacher salaries by 8 percent, according to the union's president.

Read the full story here Web Link posted Wednesday, June 15, 2016, 5:49 PM

Comments (5)

Posted by Pay to double in 8 years.
a resident of North Whisman
on Jun 16, 2016 at 5:41 am

An 8% annual increase every year would double the pay in eight years. Is the plan to raise salaries more every year? Do teachers (and other school employees) also receive automatic upward adjustments based on experience, for example? How about listing what everyone in the MV-Whisman District gets paid now and stands to get paid next school year? Include a column for the cost of benefits and another column for any overtime (paid). Other newspapers have done so. And do the same for current ompensation in the Los Altos Elementary District, the MVLA High School District and the VTA.


Posted by MV MOM
a resident of Slater
on Jun 16, 2016 at 2:54 pm

"District administrators agreed to also reduce class sizes to 24 to one for kindergarten through third grade" How soon is this supposed to happen and does this mean each K,1st,2nd, and 3rd grade class will not be more that 24 students or are the going to do the whole average thing again like the last 2 years when the K and 1st grade classes were at 27 to 1 ratio.. What does that mean for next year. I know I will be counting the kids on the class lists for each of these grades to see if the DA stayed true to there word on Aug 12th....


Posted by SC Parent
a resident of Cuesta Park
on Jun 16, 2016 at 4:05 pm

@Paytodoublein8years, go to the Transparent California web site to view public employee salaries. For the Agency, enter Mountain View Whisman. Salary info is only available as recently as 2014.


Posted by Common sense
a resident of Cuesta Park
on Jun 17, 2016 at 3:14 pm

Pay to double in 8 years asked the right question - "Do teachers (and other school employees) also receive automatic upward adjustments based on experience, for example?"

So, does the 8% reflect the total increase in compensation that a teacher will receive from 2016 to 2017, or do all of the various steps increase by 8%, such that the effective raise will be something higher? Not saying a higher raise isn't deserved, but there should be transparency on these points. In addition, is there any data comparing MVSD teacher turnover to the neighboring districts - I do recall data showing that MVSD teachers were paid less than their neighboring counterparts, which at a high level should be brought in line. We should not be losing good teachers to these districts. The money is there - it is just being spent on things that don't matter (e.g., paying off former superintendents)


Posted by Steven Nelson
a resident of Cuesta Park
on Jun 20, 2016 at 5:08 pm

"BIG, BIG pay raises ahead for MVWSD teachers" if MVLA 5% is "Big" pg. 5 May 6 Voice. :)

@ Common Sense. It all makes perfect sense (if you have studied public school salary schedules before)
The 8% is across the board every cell in the teachers salary schedule. That schedule does include year-to-year built-in salary increases (read down the schedule).

That is not the same as "total compensation" or TCOE (Total Cost Of Employment). The TCOE is what you will see the CBO update at the "First Interim Budget" report.

The TCOE will probably go up MORE than 8%. This is 'cause health care is unlikely to go up much more than 5% and the retirement costs (to STRS) are guaranteed to go up 8% ++ (that percent contribution is going up every year to try to balance the unfunded public pension "obligations")

If just comparing % in the headlines (PAUSD got "12 percent" but that was over last year (retroactive bargaining) next year, and the third year. MVWSD gave 5% (2015-16) + 8 % = 13% over two years. Which is Bigger?

How could we pull off this 'magic'? Please study the more realistic increases in property tax revenues the new CBO is using. No low-balling. Much more in-line with the City estimate and the County Tax office estimates. I do not expect to have "unanticipated" leftovers in the operating funds this year.

SN is one of five trustees of the MVWSD, these are his own opinions



Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.

Email:


Post a comment

On Wednesday, we'll be launching a new website. To prepare and make sure all our content is available on the new platform, commenting on stories and in TownSquare has been disabled. When the new site is online, past comments will be available to be seen and we'll reinstate the ability to comment. We appreciate your patience while we make this transition..

Stay informed.

Get the day's top headlines from Mountain View Online sent to your inbox in the Express newsletter.