Read the full story here Web Link posted Monday, January 25, 2016, 3:06 PM
Town Square
Palo Alto DNA-privacy case could have wide implications
Original post made on Jan 28, 2016
Read the full story here Web Link posted Monday, January 25, 2016, 3:06 PM
Comments (1)
a resident of Martens-Carmelita
on Jan 28, 2016 at 11:59 am
Sad to say, I read this story as a terrible example of a tempest in a teapot. To penalize Colman in any way is simply idiotic. If a genetic defect, which cannot be physically transmitted to others, demands penalties then I suspect many of us would be living under that gun. Nonsense... genetic carriers do not transmit the disease except to off-spring and only if the other parent has the same genetic defect!
This idiocy of penalizing this boy is what fear and ignorance achieve. Palo Alto should be ashamed of this result. Perhaps Palo Alto is not as smart a community as it thinks it is.
Don't miss out
on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.
Post a comment
Stay informed.
Get the day's top headlines from Mountain View Online sent to your inbox in the Express newsletter.