Town Square

Post a New Topic

A solution or a fantasy? Maybe a cop-out

Original post made on Oct 16, 2015

The only encouraging thing about Councilman Mike Kasperzak's proposal to create a "fair rental-practices program" to address the city's unaffordable-housing crisis is that he described the proposal as a starting point. That's good, because it demonstrates that he is at least concerned about the growing crisis that's driving families and individuals out of their homes, or creating the threat of doing so because of their landlords' frequent and unreasonable rent hikes.

Read the full story here Web Link posted Friday, October 16, 2015, 12:00 AM

Comments (2)

Posted by Gary
a resident of Sylvan Park
on Oct 16, 2015 at 4:35 pm

Six of the 7 members of the Mountain View City Council were screened and endorsed as candidates by landlord groups with fictitious names including the "Housing Council" and the "Tri-County Apartment Association." Those six councilmembers will not vote for any form of rent control - not even a temporary restriction. I forwarded to the Council papers concerning something short of rent control that might help stem sky-high rent increases and evictions to clear the way for much higher rents. It is mandatory rent increase mediation. Mediation is not arbitration. It is not binding. But it would allow tenants to question, identify and publicize "bad" landlords. Of course, there is no reason to believe that the six will even adopt mediation (which exists in nearby cities including Campbell).


Posted by youthful steve
a resident of Cuesta Park
on Oct 19, 2015 at 10:50 am

The "Tri-County Apartment Association" is a well known and local portion of a state-wide group. They advcate for the interests of themselves, as apartment property owners.

In the balloting campaign for the first attempt at a school parcel tax (Measure E 2004, $2.5M) they were positively instrumental in its narrow defeat. That measure was very progressive in its tax structure, large apartment parcels would pay significantly more than small rental homes or private residence parcels. The first school parcel tax (actually a "special tax" on property or persons) that passed cut the "progressive" nature of the tax, so 40X larger rental properties did not pay 40X more special tax ( Measure J 2004, $1.9M revenue). This second special tax did not incite the election wrath of the Apartment group.


Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.

Email:


Post a comment

On Wednesday, we'll be launching a new website. To prepare and make sure all our content is available on the new platform, commenting on stories and in TownSquare has been disabled. When the new site is online, past comments will be available to be seen and we'll reinstate the ability to comment. We appreciate your patience while we make this transition..

Stay informed.

Get the day's top headlines from Mountain View Online sent to your inbox in the Express newsletter.