Read the full story here Web Link posted Wednesday, February 25, 2015, 2:50 PM
Town Square
Sheriff wins OK of cell-phone tracker
Original post made on Feb 25, 2015
Read the full story here Web Link posted Wednesday, February 25, 2015, 2:50 PM
Comments (11)
a resident of Old Mountain View
on Feb 25, 2015 at 9:58 pm
So privacy protections happen after the fact?
The supervisors are counting on having a policy that protects privacy but the sheriff's report says that she may not release the policy to the public. How can we know if privacy is protected?
a resident of Gemello
on Feb 26, 2015 at 11:28 am
Go Simitain!
a resident of Monta Loma
on Feb 26, 2015 at 3:09 pm
Coming to a Gulag near you... What are they thinking? And no matter what - taxpayers will have to pay for the purchase AND the upkeep... Fascism at its finest!
"Smith said that the San Jose Police Department has an earlier version of the triangulation system but does not permit the sheriff's office to use it."
Well, that was a waste of taxpayer money - just like this will be!
"It could be a valuable asset for children and at-risk people," Wasserman said.
Excuse me? children? how do you figure that?
a resident of Willowgate
on Feb 26, 2015 at 3:10 pm
Joe Simitian is right-on! The approach mirrors the opening moves by the Nazi party; well-meaning people asked us to give up a "little liberty for a little security", which as Ben Franklin pointed out, means you deserve neither.
a resident of Blossom Valley
on Feb 26, 2015 at 3:32 pm
I wonder if all you privacy nuts will still be singing the same tune when, God forbid, someone molests your child and the police are unable to locate the culprit because of being hamstrung from using the latest technology.
a resident of Monta Loma
on Feb 26, 2015 at 4:13 pm
And explain to me how the invasive technology will help in any way...
How many warrants are you going to have to get to "triangulate" the evil doer?
What if he/she doesn't even have a phone? - Transients seldom do!
This is a technology solution looking for a problem - I don't want tom be a guinea pig!
a resident of Shoreline West
on Feb 26, 2015 at 5:25 pm
Glenn Meier:
Nice job using the term "privacy nuts" for those who prioritize the Constitution over vague notions of "security." Systems of surveillance are *always* abused. Not sometimes. Always. Neither the police nor anyone else can be trusted with increased surveillance powers.
a resident of Martens-Carmelita
on Feb 27, 2015 at 12:59 pm
Actually, given this means to an end vs the hazards it dampens... I favor it. I don't feel threatened to know my phone location can be known. If I don't want to be tracked I can leave it at home is one of my thoughts.
No more to say.
a resident of Monta Loma
on Feb 27, 2015 at 2:49 pm
Don't you realize that the phone company knows exactly where your phone is at all times?
All the sheriff has to do is get a warrant - there is absolutely no reason to buy this overpriced piece of technology in search of a problem that is already handled!
a resident of Blossom Valley
on Feb 28, 2015 at 11:29 am
Well now, Sheriff Smith has firmly established that she is a fan of neither the 4th nor the 2nd Amendment. Any other core elements of the Bill of Rights she'd like to trample?
Why do my neighbors keep re-electing this knucklehead?
a resident of Monta Loma
on Mar 3, 2015 at 9:18 am
The truth will set you free - well sorta...
Web Link
Don't miss out
on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.
Post a comment
Stay informed.
Get the day's top headlines from Mountain View Online sent to your inbox in the Express newsletter.