Read the full story here Web Link posted Friday, November 7, 2014, 1:56 PM
Town Square
Architect leads the way in sustainable schools
Original post made on Nov 7, 2014
Read the full story here Web Link posted Friday, November 7, 2014, 1:56 PM
Comments (5)
a resident of Cuernavaca
on Nov 7, 2014 at 4:25 pm
Interesting article. However, there is one group whose opinions are not mentioned here -- the students themselves. It would be interesting to know what they think of these buildings.
a resident of another community
on Nov 7, 2014 at 5:26 pm
By all means, going green and getting close to net-zero-energy building is the right direction. The sooner the better. Especially in schools, where our children will "get used" to do it the right way, doing our good for the world! There are several important considerations:
- Green is in the black - those projects, are economically viable and in fact if planned and done right, can turn into attractive investment!
- It's about the people - the people, in this case our children are the assets. The buildings happen to be the "tools" they're using. Very much along the lines of this article, we have an opportunity to ensure their well being, comfort and productivity, through proper daylighting and climate. Furthermore, just imagine how enthusiastic and proud them and the staff would be about it!
- And how cool would it be to use dual function windows - ones that simultaneously provide shading, diffused.usable light and comfort AND PRODUCE SOLAR ENERGY at the same time! Making net-zero a closer reality, aesthetically attractive and with compelling economics!
a resident of Slater
on Nov 10, 2014 at 1:05 pm
Greg Coladonato is a registered user.
I would like to point out that I am not the vice president of the Board Facilities Committee, I'm just a regular member.
a resident of Cuesta Park
on Nov 10, 2014 at 3:01 pm
I'm glad you covered this Kevin. Of course - I totally agree with your reporting that Board discussion at meetings have been usually limited to the minimum required by the state. Now that the tighter Title 24 rules are required - we will do that minimum (these tighter standards were used in most LASD schools when they were last improved almost 10 years ago). The architect noted - that the Title 24 sites had 50% energy savings versus the minimum (25% savings). The Middle School Phase 1 reconstructions were to the older minimum standards, which save less in operations.
"It remains to be seen if that enthusiasm will be shared by district administrators and the school board." This statement, I feel, could not be more correct! We will see if the large direct-sun windows of the collaboration buildings will pass the minimum Title 24 energy use review!
Mr. Nelson is the MVWSD Trustee who dissented with the Board majority on the last construction plans.
a resident of Gemello
on Nov 11, 2014 at 3:36 am
Get moving. At this rate, fifth graders will be adults before any building is done.
Don't miss out
on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.
Post a comment
Stay informed.
Get the day's top headlines from Mountain View Online sent to your inbox in the Express newsletter.