"Illegal" is such a harsh term. Could we please substitute "Undocumented" in its place?

Who cares?

Why does the school district want kids to not play sports? What is the big deal with hanging banners to let kids know about the various options. Several years ago Goldman decreed that YSOs could no longer give handouts to kids at schools...now no banners. What gives?

Why does the school district want kids to not play sports? What is the big deal with hanging banners to let kids know about the various options. Several years ago Goldman decreed that YSOs could no longer give handouts to kids at schools...now no banners. What gives?

Dumb use of their time. Complaining because local youth sports groups want to get their information to kids where the kids will see it. Next thing you know he'll be charging Boy and Girl Scout troops to use their rooms after school for their meetings; whoops, they already do!

Illegal is a strong word for this type of misdemeanor Steve, however hanging banners anywhere else than the 3 designated sites, does break the new policy and city code. Little League is guilty for sure. They were part of the 2 year collaborative effort between the Parks and Recreation Department, the Parks and Rec. Commissioners & Youth Sports Organizations (YSO’s), to get “city approval” of a new field use and banners policy. However in their defense, it is difficult for YSOs to police the activities of all of its volunteers; some volunteers are more zealous than others and in the highly competitive world of youth sports, it’s standard practice to ask for forgiveness rather than permission!!

Why do I know a lot about this topic……because 2 years ago, I was on the receiving end of a potential citation for trying to promote my youth rugby program (www.ayru.net) with banners in MV! Web Link

However I now appreciate that I was wrong and I now understand that we need to have limitations on what is hung where, when and for how long if we are to maintain the attractive character of our beautiful city. And so this probably answers Greg's question - yes it does matter and yes we should all care. Mountain View is a city that we should be proud of and cherish.

I actually applaud Craig Goldman for suggesting another two additional sites for hanging banners. I support Craig’s idea because the ability of YSOs to communicate to their target audience has been significantly curtailed in recent years by new practices adopted by the MVWSD! Randy is correct, YSOs are unable to distribute (hard copy or electronic) flyers in schools newsletters to inform parents about “non-school related” activities.

The schools district does provide an area on its web site to allow the communication of information about YSO activities. While this web site function (Public Service Announcements) is very well managed by MVWSD staff, it makes a grossly erroneous assumption that all families have ready access to the web. In reality some sections of community who could most benefit from information about YSOs, are actually the ones who miss out. So additional sites to hang banners would be most welcome while the MVWSD has a rethink their current exclusion policy.

I get the argument about “going green” and reducing the use of paper – we should all want to reduce the impact we are having on the environment; however the current solution deprives parents of making informed choices for their children and that’s never a good idea!

YSOs (AYSO, MVLA, Little League, AYRU etc) play a key role in our community. They reinforce the key life skills such as teamwork and leadership that our school teachers try to instill in our youth. In addition, in AYRU, we emphasize the importance of having respect for seniors and figures of authority (referees and coaches) – a feature that is sadly missing from most youth sports today.

More importantly, YSO’s support the efforts of PE teachers by encouraging children to lead healthy life styles, to keep fit, stay away from drugs of abuse and avoid the perils of obesity. However it is clear that even in our prosperous city we (collectively) are falling short of this responsibility as highlighted by this report Web Link

Maybe it is time for all the key stakeholders who have responsibility for the education and well being our youth, to take a fresh look at their remit and analyze the results produced by their collective efforts. Just for one crazy moment, let’s toy with the idea that, rather than restrict opportunities for YSOs to communicate with the MV community, we should instead proactively facilitate their attempts to inform parents and kids. We may find ourselves in the curious position where the benefits of playing youth sport can be enjoyed by all sections of our wonderful city.

Why not add all school locations as "legal" locations -- and have the sport orgs pay the city to put banners up and take them down? Doesn't the city mow the park areas of every school in town? Couldn't the people who come to mow have a schedule of which banners should be up for particular dates? Take down any that are not on the list. The youth sports orgs can pay the cost of this additional work and of course they will pay to print the banners.

The best way for families to know what youth sports are offered and when you need to sign your kid up is by having that info highly visible at their school sites. This is particularly true for families who may not be on email or parenting/neighborhood online groups. I would have never known when I needed to sign my kid up for soccer except that I saw a banner at her elementary school before she started kindergarten. That is no longer allowed.

Having youth sports banners up around town also reminds all of us what a wonderful variety of opportunities available to kids in our city. Perhaps the city could confirm that all youth sport orgs also offer scholarships to kids on free/reduced price lunches if those groups are allowed to have banners at public school sites?

clue: First Amendment... freedom of speech... foundation of our system of self government... civic speech = the most valuable form of speech ... parks: public forum ... strict scrutiny... "narrowly tailored to serve substantial government interess" ... etc. etc. ....

The aesthetic character of a city is important, especially to property owners. But for civic speech in a public forum, the freedom to speak and to hear what anyone would speak trumps aesthetics. The ordinance being discussed almost certainly is unconstitutional.

Dear School-District Board,

you are saying that you guys have nothing more important to discuss?
This is the most important issue at hand? It's a critical issue??

Who cares if those posters are hung legally or illegally?

You make a fine mockery of yourself by announcing you are wasting your time on this!

Also: there is the 1st Amendment - you remember that?