NEWS FLASH: There will always be haves and have nots, and, surprise of all surprises, there will always be a gap between them.

For example, there are people who can afford to own a house in Palo Alto (premium housing) vs those who can afford to rent in East Palo Alto (not so premium housing) a.k.a the haves and the have nots.

The Voice needs to follow the news more closely.

Google has said: "The NYT is quite simply wrong. We have not had any conversations with Verizon about paying for carriage of Google or YouTube traffic. We remain as committed as we always have been to an open Internet."

Verizon has said: "The NYT article regarding conversations between Google and Verizon is mistaken. It fundamentally misunderstands our purpose. As we said in our earlier FCC filing, our goal is an Internet policy framework that ensures openness and accountability, and incorporates specific FCC authority, while maintaining investment and innovation. To suggest this is a business arrangement between our companies is entirely incorrect."

The article should say that Google and Verizon deny that there is any such deal rather than saying the Google denies that the nonexistent deal is bad. If they deny the deal then it's arguable whether this is news at all or just furthering a rumor mill.

***From NYTimes Article***
"nearing an agreement that could allow Verizon to speed some online content to Internet users more quickly if the content’s creators are willing to pay for the privilege".

"The agreement could eventually lead to higher charges for Internet users".

I'm sick of these companies trying to squeeze every freakin dollar out of every possible person.

Congresswoman Eshoo, it is Congress who is responsible, not the FCC. The Communications Act is outdated, based on technology model that is nearly 100 years old. The Act needs to be scrapped, rewritten so that it is modeled on our modern communications systems. So get cracking and work with policy and legal experts on crafting a modern communications act based on a layered regulatory model. Kevin Werbach is a good person to approach for help.