Town Square

Post a New Topic

Palo Alto to fight high-speed-rail 'betrayal' bills

Original post made on Mar 16, 2010

Palo Alto is girding for battle against proposed legislation that could make the California high speed rail project exempt from environmental regulations. That city's mayor calls the bills "a real betrayal" of earlier commitments.

Read the full story here Web Link posted Tuesday, March 16, 2010, 11:05 AM

Comments (9)

Posted by Rodger
a resident of Sylvan Park
on Mar 16, 2010 at 7:23 pm

Palo Alto seems to have a good plan for getting the high speed rail built underground in their city. I think Mountain View should work to make sure that we do not end up with the left overs which would be a rail system above grade or at grade. We need a tunnel or a cut and fill system through Mountain View. So far the city leaders remind me of a deer in the headlights, ie do nothing until the design is fixed after which will be too late.

The real solution to High Speed Rail is to have a new election to kill this project, air craft are much faster and will not cost the state $42B plus overruns plus interest.

Rodger


Posted by Political Insider
a resident of Old Mountain View
on Mar 16, 2010 at 7:37 pm

Pure nonsense. There is nothing wrong with at grade. It's obviously done all over the world. None of the people in PA are experts on trains so why do you think they know how to design something.


Posted by NeHi
a resident of Cuesta Park
on Mar 16, 2010 at 8:32 pm

Sounds like this article is about "permission or forgiveness".

We lived a couple of years less than 200m from the S.P. tracks. When the freight trains passed, we suspended conversation. When the jets from Moffett took off, we involuntarily ducked as well. We thought of it as a minor inconvenience; hey, they were there first.

Now, near the tracks, we have a population along the 145 year old right-of-way that have lived nearby for a more than a generation with little more than CalTrain's noise. Quantitatively, how much more noise and visual pollution should people be required to tolerate?

Electrification of the railroad should reduce noise levels and allow power regeneration on braking, both good things. How fast do we need to go??


Posted by Joe
a resident of Old Mountain View
on Mar 17, 2010 at 5:45 am

Political Insider is right - if these towns want HSR underground let them pay for it. Thats what the East Bay did when BART was built. Why should everybody in Calif pay for the wealthiest towns in the state to delay the project and increase costs. If they want it in a special way, pay for it. Or move it to the East Bay! These exclusive towns seem to live OK with Caltran at-grade. More NIMBY whining from the state's wealthiest communities.


Posted by Reality Slap
a resident of Old Mountain View
on Mar 17, 2010 at 6:11 am

Nobody ever talks about what happens when the trains hit SF.
Oh goodie, now we get to do a Uturn and go back down to where we just were.
HSR up the peninsula to a dead end is a joke and an utter waste of money.


Posted by Political Insider
a resident of Old Mountain View
on Mar 17, 2010 at 2:31 pm

When the trains hit SF, the ride ends just as it does with Caltrain commuters. There is no Uturn and the HSR trains are on a timed schedule to return to LA . Far fewer runs than Caltrain.


Posted by Richard
a resident of another community
on Mar 26, 2010 at 4:41 am

The thought of running the trail below is out of the question. It would triple the cost at the very least. I has ridden high speed trains around the world, and they are very quiet.....we are not talking deisel freight trains here folks.


Posted by Jane
a resident of The Crossings
on Apr 2, 2010 at 1:56 pm

We're not talking about just the noise of the trains. I think noise is a smaller issue.
From Community Coalition on High speed rail:
"What are the impacts of the various vertical alignments?
Because of the frequency of trains (one approximately every 2 minutes during peak hours, see below), any at or above grade alignment will have an enormous impact. There will be noise, vibration and air turbulence as trains pass through. Visually, the least intrusive element will be the 4’ sound wall.... 25’ catenary poles, carrying the wires that supply power to the train..."

There is significant environmental impact to build a long tall wall next to people's houses. There are actually many people living right next to the tracks.

If it were you, you will not want to see a huge construction project next to your house, cutting down trees, digging holes, creating debris and noise either.
Not many people take trains anyway. What a waste of money!
Wish the money can be spent on local schools instead to hire back the teachers.


Posted by Lance
a resident of another community
on May 31, 2010 at 11:45 pm

The cost estimate is a joke it will cost billions more than the original estimate and no one will be riding the highspeed train. A simple fact is that it is much cheaper and quicker to fly or drive. The same distance that the train will travel in from SF to LA in 3 hours can be driven in 5-6 and just as if flying upon arrival you would have to rent a car and pay to park a car at the station. The cost of riding the train and convenience of having and driving your own car out ways the few hours saved in travel time.


Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.

Email:


Post a comment

On Wednesday, we'll be launching a new website. To prepare and make sure all our content is available on the new platform, commenting on stories and in TownSquare has been disabled. When the new site is online, past comments will be available to be seen and we'll reinstate the ability to comment. We appreciate your patience while we make this transition..

Stay informed.

Get the day's top headlines from Mountain View Online sent to your inbox in the Express newsletter.