News

Rail directors told to lie low in Midpeninsula

Diridon asks area residents to be more 'polite' to rail officials

Two members of the California High-Speed Rail Authority board of directors have been advised by agency staff not to participate in public hearings on the Midpeninsula, where residents and elected officials have persistently criticized and occasionally jeered the voter-approved rail project.

Rod Diridon, a former Santa Clara County supervisor and member of the rail authority's board of directors, said at Thursday's board meeting that he and fellow board member Quentin Kopp were instructed to avoid the Midpeninsula region, where city leaders adamantly oppose above-ground rail designs. Two of the cities in the area, Menlo Park and Atherton, have sued the rail authority, forcing it to rewrite several sections of its Environmental Impact Report for the Peninsula segment. A third city, Palo Alto, filed a friend-of-the-court brief in support of the plaintiffs in the case.

The rail authority on Thursday unanimously approved a Supplemental Alternatives Analysis for the San Francisco-to-San Jose segment of the rail line. The document essentially eliminates the two locally popular options: covered trenches and deep tunnels, and recommends designs that rely on at-grade tracks, aerial viaducts and some short tunnels.

The rail authority approved the report with little discussion despite pleas from many Peninsula rail officials and residents who asked the board to keep the tunneling options on the table. Just before their vote, Diridon said he has "a little impatience" about retaining all the design options that were previously identified and reaffirmed that the rail system will go through the Peninsula and along the Pacheco Pass.

He also asked Peninsula residents to "come together" and help the rail authority come up with a solution that's both acceptable and affordable.

Help sustain the local news you depend on.

Your contribution matters. Become a member today.

Join

"We've got to move from our entrenched positions," Diridon said, with no hint of irony.

He quickly clarified that by "we" he means the residents because the rail authority isn't allowed to reach conclusions before adequately studying all options. This was too much for one member of the audience, who interrupted Diridon with a shout of, "Give me a break!"

Diridon told the audience that the interruption was "really rude" that that interruptions like that one was one of the reasons he and Kopp no longer make presentations on the Peninsula.

"Last time we were there, you shouted us down," Diridon said. "That's not democracy. That's a sick kind of process."

Diridon said he would be willing to return if people were more polite.

Stay informed

Get daily headlines sent straight to your inbox in our Express newsletter.

Stay informed

Get daily headlines sent straight to your inbox in our Express newsletter.

"I'll come back and meet with you any time that you be polite and let me meet with you," he added.

Not all directors are avoiding the Peninsula. Board Chair Curt Pringle last month toured the Caltrain Corridor with elected officials from Mountain View, Palo Alto, Menlo Park and Atherton.

Menlo Park Mayor Rich Cline thanked Pringle for his visit and said communication between the rail authority and local leaders has improved.

Most Viewed Stories

Most Viewed Stories

Gennady Sheyner
 
Gennady Sheyner covers the City Hall beat in Palo Alto as well as regional politics, with a special focus on housing and transportation. Before joining the Palo Alto Weekly/PaloAltoOnline.com in 2008, he covered breaking news and local politics for the Waterbury Republican-American, a daily newspaper in Connecticut. Read more >>

Follow on Twitter @mvvoice, Facebook and on Instagram @mvvoice for breaking news, local events, photos, videos and more.

Rail directors told to lie low in Midpeninsula

Diridon asks area residents to be more 'polite' to rail officials

Two members of the California High-Speed Rail Authority board of directors have been advised by agency staff not to participate in public hearings on the Midpeninsula, where residents and elected officials have persistently criticized and occasionally jeered the voter-approved rail project.

Rod Diridon, a former Santa Clara County supervisor and member of the rail authority's board of directors, said at Thursday's board meeting that he and fellow board member Quentin Kopp were instructed to avoid the Midpeninsula region, where city leaders adamantly oppose above-ground rail designs. Two of the cities in the area, Menlo Park and Atherton, have sued the rail authority, forcing it to rewrite several sections of its Environmental Impact Report for the Peninsula segment. A third city, Palo Alto, filed a friend-of-the-court brief in support of the plaintiffs in the case.

The rail authority on Thursday unanimously approved a Supplemental Alternatives Analysis for the San Francisco-to-San Jose segment of the rail line. The document essentially eliminates the two locally popular options: covered trenches and deep tunnels, and recommends designs that rely on at-grade tracks, aerial viaducts and some short tunnels.

The rail authority approved the report with little discussion despite pleas from many Peninsula rail officials and residents who asked the board to keep the tunneling options on the table. Just before their vote, Diridon said he has "a little impatience" about retaining all the design options that were previously identified and reaffirmed that the rail system will go through the Peninsula and along the Pacheco Pass.

He also asked Peninsula residents to "come together" and help the rail authority come up with a solution that's both acceptable and affordable.

"We've got to move from our entrenched positions," Diridon said, with no hint of irony.

He quickly clarified that by "we" he means the residents because the rail authority isn't allowed to reach conclusions before adequately studying all options. This was too much for one member of the audience, who interrupted Diridon with a shout of, "Give me a break!"

Diridon told the audience that the interruption was "really rude" that that interruptions like that one was one of the reasons he and Kopp no longer make presentations on the Peninsula.

"Last time we were there, you shouted us down," Diridon said. "That's not democracy. That's a sick kind of process."

Diridon said he would be willing to return if people were more polite.

"I'll come back and meet with you any time that you be polite and let me meet with you," he added.

Not all directors are avoiding the Peninsula. Board Chair Curt Pringle last month toured the Caltrain Corridor with elected officials from Mountain View, Palo Alto, Menlo Park and Atherton.

Menlo Park Mayor Rich Cline thanked Pringle for his visit and said communication between the rail authority and local leaders has improved.

Comments

Old Ben
Shoreline West
on Aug 9, 2010 at 12:06 pm
Old Ben, Shoreline West
on Aug 9, 2010 at 12:06 pm

Why should anyone be polite to a pack of thieving oligarchs? Has Quentin Kopp ever done an honest day's work? These people are tax parasites.


MVFlyer
Monta Loma
on Aug 9, 2010 at 12:09 pm
MVFlyer, Monta Loma
on Aug 9, 2010 at 12:09 pm

This is going to get held up for years. While I fully agree with the folks in PA/MP/Atherton that running the train through their cities at grade or above will create many problems, I also agree with the HSR commission that the cities need to come up with other suggestions to discuss. And the HSR can't be so dogmatic as to not consider other options. I think there's some pigheadedness on both sides.

I'm not sure that the PA/MP/Atherton contingent has considered the massive construction issues with tunneling, creating a mess in their cities for years. And the HSRC needs to think about quality of life in these cities and others along the way...I still believe that a right of way along 101 is the best way to go--noise and speed aren't issues along the 101 corridor.


Konrad M. Sosnow
another community
on Aug 9, 2010 at 2:19 pm
Konrad M. Sosnow, another community
on Aug 9, 2010 at 2:19 pm

Ron Diridon has a lot of gall! The HSR Directors have ignored the desires of the cities along the Peninsula and now he asks for us to be polite. Give me a break!


Old Ben
Shoreline West
on Aug 9, 2010 at 2:25 pm
Old Ben, Shoreline West
on Aug 9, 2010 at 2:25 pm

It's a SCAM. Shut it down and get whatever monies have been spent back.


Garrett
another community
on Aug 9, 2010 at 2:50 pm
Garrett, another community
on Aug 9, 2010 at 2:50 pm

When we were move on to better transit options, instead of living in islands. We can't house enought people in the area because nobody wants it, traffic is bad because the roads can't carry it. We add jobs the people still come to. AUGH


oldabelincoln
Cuesta Park
on Aug 9, 2010 at 4:31 pm
oldabelincoln, Cuesta Park
on Aug 9, 2010 at 4:31 pm

It's time to revisit the basic assumptions behind HSR between SJ and SF.

Over the years I've noticed that people are willing to believe in magic as long as it is invoked in an area outside their own field of competency. We who voted for HSR never expected that it would be barrelling through our community at or above grade. We were willing to accept some unspecified magic solution that somehow, in the name of all that is good about the idea of public transit, would make HSR into something other than a massive noise generator.

That will teach us about magic solutions.

The more I look at the proposed HSR implementation, the less I like it, and the more convinced I become that high speed rail is a good idea that unfortunately will not work here.

A better idea whould be to improve local transit to and from our airports, another European idea that would probably work much better here than what's being discussed.


Wondering
Old Mountain View
on Aug 9, 2010 at 8:45 pm
Wondering, Old Mountain View
on Aug 9, 2010 at 8:45 pm

Yes, we need better transit options. But not this. Finish BART.


USA
Registered user
Old Mountain View
on Aug 9, 2010 at 11:08 pm
USA, Old Mountain View
Registered user
on Aug 9, 2010 at 11:08 pm

Shutting down public communication is the classic symptom of an organization reaching its final days.



USA
Registered user
Old Mountain View
on Aug 9, 2010 at 11:13 pm
USA, Old Mountain View
Registered user
on Aug 9, 2010 at 11:13 pm

"... residents and elected officials have persistently criticized and occasionally jeered the voter-approved rail project."

Lordy, it like that joke floating around about Feinstein coming to life: Web Link


USA
Registered user
Old Mountain View
on Aug 9, 2010 at 11:17 pm
USA, Old Mountain View
Registered user
on Aug 9, 2010 at 11:17 pm

OMG, its not a joke. Feinstein actually said that. Here's the CSPAN clip on YouTube: Web Link


STOP HSR
Monta Loma
on Aug 10, 2010 at 6:38 am
STOP HSR, Monta Loma
on Aug 10, 2010 at 6:38 am

This MINDLESS and ABHORRENT waste of our money and our kids money must be stopped.
The only ones pushing it now are the people who get their PAYCHECKS because of HSR. The entire project was based on FALSE ridership estimates so those involved could get your children's money in their paycheck.
They're stealing from our children now.


George
Rex Manor
on Aug 10, 2010 at 8:38 pm
George, Rex Manor
on Aug 10, 2010 at 8:38 pm

Shut it down... In these days of tough economic times, we don't need the expense, we don't need Govt. telling us what we need, and we don't need friggen politicians saying that we are "rude" because we demand accountability and discourse.

In the words of a carpenter, Diridon and Kopp... Screw You...

George.


USA
Registered user
Old Mountain View
on Aug 11, 2010 at 12:49 am
USA, Old Mountain View
Registered user
on Aug 11, 2010 at 12:49 am

Grennady, you made a typo in the headline. There should be a comma between lie and low.


Old Ben
Shoreline West
on Aug 11, 2010 at 2:48 am
Old Ben, Shoreline West
on Aug 11, 2010 at 2:48 am

Tax parasites, every one of them. Feinstein is the scum of the earth.


R$odger
Sylvan Park
on Aug 11, 2010 at 9:34 pm
R$odger, Sylvan Park
on Aug 11, 2010 at 9:34 pm

The only solution is to recall this project. We need ideas on how to set recall process in motion, working with the HSR people just wastes time and gives us false hopes


Chw
North Whisman
on Aug 12, 2010 at 2:28 pm
Chw, North Whisman
on Aug 12, 2010 at 2:28 pm

This mindset is why there is no BART along the peninsula. Folks along the peninsula need to be more solution-minded about the HS rail, perhaps propose to build it along the 280 corridor.


"Just Think About It"
Cuesta Park
on Aug 14, 2010 at 9:37 am
"Just Think About It", Cuesta Park
on Aug 14, 2010 at 9:37 am

Two members of the California High-Speed Rail Authority board of directors have been advised by agency staff not to participate in public hearings on the Mid-Peninsula, where residents and elected officials have persistently criticized and occasionally jeered the voter-approved rail project. This is being paid for with our tax dollars and the California High-Speed Rail Authority board of directors will not meet with city officials? I thought our city management and elected city officials were to represent its citizens? Maybe we have no say?...........Just think about it. And this is a government "for the people" and "by the people". Wake Up!
..............Just Think About It"...............


Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.

Post a comment

On Wednesday, we'll be launching a new website. To prepare and make sure all our content is available on the new platform, commenting on stories and in TownSquare has been disabled. When the new site is online, past comments will be available to be seen and we'll reinstate the ability to comment. We appreciate your patience while we make this transition.